When saving an edit to an object from a filtered list view you are, by default, returned to list view without any of your filters applied.
This solves that problem, keeping the filtered view in a session variable until you reach a point where the session key is deleted.
This solution doesn't require changes to template code...this is completely self contained within your own admin.py files.
The solution presented here is a revision of a previous patch, which has been modified for Django 1.4. The Django 1.3 version exists at:
http://djangosnippets.org/snippets/2531/
From chronosllc:
The advantage to our solution over the above linked solution is that under different use cases the user may or may not be redirected to the filtered list_view. For example, if you edit an object and click the save and continue button, then you would lose the filter when you finally finished editing the object and clicked save.
Added on here is a delete of the session key when users add objects, the reasoning we're going this route is we don't want to return users to filtered views when they just added a new object. Your mileage may vary and if so, it's easy enough to fit your own needs.
This is an updated snippet based on http://djangosnippets.org/snippets/2260/
The updated snippet can limit the filtering options for a foreign key field to only those entries that are related to the current model. I.e. if you have an Author model with a FK to Institution model, you can configure Author's changelist to include a filter on Institution, but only allow you to select institutions that have authors. Institutions that do not have authors won't show up on the list.
To enable this, in your model's ModelAdmin class, set
<fieldname>_fk_filter_related_only=True
<fieldname>_fk_filter_name_field=<display this field of the related model in filter list>
For example, in your AuthorAdmin class, you can do
institution_fk_filter_related_only=True
institution_fk_filter_name_field='name'
Note that for the effect described above to work, you just need the last few lines of the big else clause in __init__, so if you don't care about filtering by FK property, you can just grab those few lines and create a simpler FilterSpec.
- ForeignKey
- Django-Admin
- FilterSpec
Ever tried to unit test custom fields or abstract models? If so, you probably used a solution like [this one](http://djangosnippets.org/snippets/2843/). It surely works, but it has some issues:
1. Runs 'syncdb' several times.
2. It's not automatic. You must add the mixin or copy the code to each of the TestCases.
This test runner adds to INSTALLED_APPS the 'app.tests' package for **each of the specified** apps, **before the 'syncdb' happens**.
This has the [discovery runner](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-discover-runner) as a dependency (for 1.5 only, it will be the default in 1.6). However, it comes as a mixin so it should be easily pluggable to other test runners.
If you intend to use the mixin with other runners, note that it imports 'app.tests.models' so it won't work with tests modules (tests.py). Your runner must "use" test packages (like discovery runner).
# USAGE
# in your settings.py:
TESTAPPS_INSTALL = (
'app1',
'app2',
# ...
)
TEST_RUNNER = 'testapp_runner.DiscoverTestAppRunner' # example import path
# extra apps in command line.
# run test for apps 'app1' to 'app4', adding 'app3' and 'app4' to the TESTAPPS_INSTALL setting.
manage.py test app1 app2 app3 app4 --with-test-app=app3 --with-test-app=app4
- django
- testing
- apps
- testrunner
- test-runner
- app-models